I
have spent a number of evenings debating with myself the planned content
of this next section. On the one hand, the information is crucial;
and on the other hand, there are some parts of it that are so extremely
disturbing that I have had difficulty dealing with the images conjured
in my own mind as a result of examining it. So, the question became:
how much do I really need to tell to make the point? Ought I to just
record the results of research and leave out HOW these results were
obtained? Or does the reader have a right to know precisely how various
researchers come to their conclusions?
As
I was pondering this issue, something the Cassiopaeans once said came
to my mind:
3rd density STS
orientation includes the thought of "dominion" over 2nd density, and
this is merely a continuation of the energy buildup of the approach
of the wave... Some of the lessons are interesting indeed. When you
assume that capture and imprisonment of those of lesser capacity than
you is for "the good," why should not you expect those of greater
capacity than you to assume the same regarding you?! [07-14-96]
This then led me
to think about the Hermetic Maxim: As above, so below; and certain implications
that had never dawned on me began to shape themselves into a framework
of understanding. I would like to share this with you.
In our world, we
have many classes of people; many segments of the population that are
engaged in many different pursuits, occupations, and fields of endeavor.
All of these are more or less "compartmentalized" so that,
very often, what one group is aware of and what they do is unavailable
to other groups. There is a large, broad based group of your average
"Mr. and Mrs. Citizen," who are, for the most part, unaware
of most everything. They are born, live their lives in a "normal"
way with all the "normal" accoutrements of an average life,
including their normal allotment of "momentous" events such
as school, graduations, the first job, marriages, births, deaths, football
games, vacations to the seashore or mountains, friends, movies, and
on and on. For the most part, it is all struggle to keep in step with
the times and expectations of society.
In recent years,
many polls have been conducted which ask the question: Are you happy
with your life? A surprisingly high percentage of citizens respond:
Yes. Why is this surprising? Because statistics show that mood disorders
such as depression and anxiety are on the increase, becoming more widespread
all the time. Depression related suicides are also on the rise. So,
we have to ask the question: if everyone is so happy, why is depression
at near epidemic proportions in our society?
It is clear that
a huge segment our society is in denial. People cling to what they believe
is the "cultural norm," what is "socially expected,"
and then pronounce themselves happy if they can come anywhere close
to meeting it.
Twenty or more years
ago, the individual who was on anti-depressant drugs was a rarity. Sure,
they took an occasional Valium or Librium during times of crisis, but
those are relatively harmless relaxants. Nowadays, practically every
other person you talk to is either taking, or has a family member who
is taking, Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Serzone, Tofranil, or any combination
thereof. This is the ubiquitous medical solution to the epidemic of
depression.
The psychosomatic
network operates through a series of delicately balanced chemical interactions
and feedback loops. The question of how drugs - legal or illegal - enter
the network and affect the natural homeostatic balance is seldom addressed.
Drugs go to work
at the level where brain cells are "communicating" with each
other across synapses. Natural chemicals are "squirted" out
by one or another cell and taken up by another. If there is too much
of the chemical, the body has a "mop up" operation called
a "re-uptake" mechanism by which the cell reabsorbs the excess.
Many anti-depressants are used to block the re-uptake mechanism, allowing
excess chemicals to flood the body. It is suggested that this "corrects"
the imbalance.
The problem is,
this "Band-Aid" approach does not measure what else may be
going on in the body at the many other sites where these chemicals also
taken up by cells.
One example is Prozac.
Prozac works because it allows the body to be flooded with seretonin.
It is now known that the intestines are loaded with seretonin receptors
and that people on anti-depressants very often have gastrointestinal
problems. The epidemic of digestive disorders is evidenced by the amazing
number of television commercials advertising antacids.
I'm sure you have
all seen the nice little drama of the young family at the circus with
their excited children, only the family fun is about to be spoiled because
the parents are suffering from - dare we say it? - ACID INDIGESTION!
And, of course, the fatherly pharmaceutical company in their infinite
wisdom and mercy have just the solution!
Now, of course,
this is not to say that everyone who has acid indigestion is on anti-depressants,
but the point is: such commercials are an effort to "normalize"
such a state. Just what are they trying to cover up, I wonder. But,
that could take us off on a whole other subject. I want to get back
to the compartmentalization of our world and how it is a metaphor for
higher realities.
It seems that, for
the most part, even the medical professionals who are prescribing these
drugs are not even asking questions. It's easy to say that there is
a "conspiracy" of doctors to drug the populace; but as most
of us know, our physicians and nurses are mostly interested in healing,
and they work with the system that is promoted by our culture as being
the "right method." They learn what they practice in medical
schools, taught by professors who learned it from their teachers. The
research that leads to the different concepts of healing is funded by
- well, here we hit a curious thing - pharmaceutical companies. And,
of course, pharmaceutical companies have a vested interest in making
money from selling pharmaceuticals.
So, shall we blame
the drug companies? Is it merely greed?
When we begin to
examine this issue, we find that most of those doing this research are
truly convinced that the approach they are taught IS also the proper
methodology. They are convinced, in their own minds, that it is "for
the good of mankind."
If we think for
a moment about the knowledge that is available to any given scholar
or scientist in the many fields of study, and compare that to what the
average citizen may know about any of this, we come to the idea that
there are all kinds of things that are known and which are going on
to which most people are oblivious. When we think about the meetings
that may take place between leaders of nations or diplomats; or operations
that may be undertaken by any intelligence organization, we are again
confronted with the ignorance of the majority of people. We may read
books by people claiming to be "in the know," and we may hear
stories and watch movies, and come to some idea of the many areas of
our world in which we can only participate vicariously, fictitiously,
or not at all; but can only suspect.
But even at those
rarefied levels, we find that each and every one of them, with few exceptions,
believe that what they are doing - even if it entails secrecy - is for
the good of man!
And, of course,
each and every different group has its own idea of what is good for
man, and some of this opinions are diametrically opposed to one another.
When we step back from the picture, we see that something crucial is
being missed - and this crucial thing seems to be the ability to observe
the world objectively - empirically, if you will - and to use the mind
to assess the "fruits of the ideas" in an objective way.
I once was told
that in China, (and I can't verify that this is true), at a certain
time in its history, doctors were required to post above their doorways
a list of all their patients who had died. Not only that, the custom
was that the patient did not pay the doctor until he was cured. This
had the effect of motivating doctors to figure out what REALLY worked
in terms of healing therapies.
In Western medicine,
it seems that this "motivation" to find a real cure, a real
solution, on an individual basis, is lacking. Not only that, but this
"motivation" factor is missing from all other areas of our
lives.
For but one example:
our governments are composed of individuals who seek office NOT to serve
the people - even if they give lip service to that idea - but for money
and power. If the "payoff" of money and power were removed
from the sphere of government, if our elected officials were required
to "post the number of patients who had died" above their
doors, and were only paid if they were successful in solving the problems
of the public sector, you can be sure that there would be a mad rush
by many of them to get out of government, and the field would be left
to those who were really capable of solving our problems.
In 1974, my grandfather
died because he was killed by the medical profession. His "diagnosed"
problem was high blood pressure. He was treated by administering the
standard medications indicated by the medical profession at the time,
and died when his potassium levels plunged and his heart stopped. Ten
years later, I watched an expose on a news magazine TV show that exposed
the fact that this "standard treatment" had killed so many
people that doctors were finally questioning the selection of drugs
they were using to treat high blood pressure. It was a scandal of national
proportions. And it wasn't the first one.
I grew up next door
to a child who was a Thalidomide baby. We were best friends for many
years, until I moved away. Sammy had no arms and one leg was a vestigial
"flipper." The other leg was normal. Sammy was a genius with
a delightful personality and an assertive, no-nonsense, ambitious nature.
There was no question that he was "in charge" in our relationship
and I spent a lot of time executing his wishes - building things, setting
things up, fetching and carrying - and just generally being his arms
and legs. I'll never forget the year that he decided that Christmas
trees ought to have a use after Christmas, and we were going to create
a "magic forest." It was my job to go up and down the streets
of our neighborhood and retrieve all the trees set out for the trash
collectors. I had to drag them back - many of them bigger than I was
- and set them up according to Sammy's specifications. In the end, we
had about 50 of them.
I never thought
much about the fact that Sammy was "different" when we were
growing up. I was 4 and he was 2 when we were plopped into a sandbox
together for the first time, and all of his development took place before
my eyes and seemed natural. He could do just about everything with his
feet that I could do with my hands including using scissors and playing
the organ. When he came over to my house to play, and we had a snack,
a special stool was available for him to sit on at the table that was
the same height as the table so he could use his feet to eat, and once
he was situated, my grandmother would wash his feet for him. When I
would go out with him and his family on a trip to a store or a movie,
I was aware that other people stared and moved away from him, and so
I KNEW that he was different, but I never gave much thought until I
grew up.
It was then that
I learned that Sammy was the way he was because a doctor gave his mother
some pills for morning sickness.
I never, ever forgot
that a doctor - acting in good faith - had done this.
Now, if our own
3rd density world has so many layers and compartments and secrets and
agendas, do we think that it is possible that the same could be true
for the 4th density STS reality?
As above, so below.
In the present time,
there are all sorts of "communications" with "higher
beings" and sources of all kinds taking place. When we look at
this, we find that there is the same problem apparent as we find in
our own world. Can it be that there are 4th density beings - or higher
- who communicate with humans by various means, who are simply as ignorant
of the doings in their realities as we are in our own? Or, that their
agendas - even if framed in the terms that it is for the good of humanity
- could be less than positive?
And if our own "scientists"
will experiment on our little 2nd density companions in ways that you
will soon discover, do we for one minute think that "scientists"
at 4th density would not feel justified doing the same with us?
I don't know about
you, but the very thought of it produces in me a sensation that I prefer
not to extend for any period of time, and my mind hastily closes the
door on such a thought. But, at the same time, I understand clearly
that I must be knowledgeable about these things, just as I must educate
myself about health care in order to prevent myself or those close to
me from being used as "guinea pigs" by the medical profession.
Yet, it is a thought
that we must consider; and consider well.
Not only do we have
to consider the fact that there are those with whom we come into direct
contact who, with the best of intentions, can destroy our lives through
their own ignorance, we have to consider those who have taken these
ideas to levels of implementation that are staggering. In our own "modern"
times, there was such activity, supposedly rooted in the idea that it
was "for the good of mankind."And those who closed their eyes
to it became its victims in spirit if not in fact. I am reminded of
an account by Elie Wiesel where he tells how his father refused to believe
that the Nazis would ever do anything "uncivilized" and put
off endlessly taking his family to safety. And then, it was too late.
He was warned, he was urged, he was entreated - but he steadfastly refused
to believe any evil of anyone.
In the present time,
we have many who are taking this stand; believing that "love is
the answer" and the "open heart" is the way. And over
and over again in history we see this approach leading to massacre and
bloodbath, with the result that darkness falls upon the land and it
is a long time before balance is reestablished.
Such individuals
claim that their knowledge comes from "higher sources," and
that they are sure it is truth because - well, because it FEELS good!
They are sure that love can only beget love, and if they have an "open
heart" that is full of love, that nothing that is not of that "frequency"
can ever pass that "barrier."
The problem here
is much the same as the problems we find within our own world. As the
Cassiopaeans noted: "When you assume that capture and imprisonment
of those of lesser capacity than you is for "the good," why should not
you expect those of greater capacity than you to assume the same regarding
you?!"
We learn from Michael
Topper, in simplified form here:
...We well know
the "law" of 3rd density: No two objects can occupy the
same space at the same time. It should be obvious that this is a function
of perception. ...Perception determines the outline of what's to stand
as an "object." In 3rd density, objects are mutually exclusive
and define one another by contrast - by their differences. ...Perception
of UNITY ...is a function of higher density cognition. It requires
the use of faculties that are presently "recessed" in our
being, and only occasionally accessed.
When, through
spiritual practice or discipline performed on this plane, we perceive
the "luminous wholeness" of "separate objects,"
we are experiencing a momentary coordination with energies belonging
to other densities and drawn into our frame of reference.
...3rd density
is the level where consciousness "awakens to itself" by
a process of modeled approximations of things "out there."
That is to say that the internal dialogue of the soul is "verbalized"
by the symbols of the world - the reality in which we "live and
move and have our being."
...The potential
of 3rd density is pure awareness of consciousness itself without the
need for "descriptions" or "models" out there.
This is why the 3rd density level of consciousness is a critical threshold.
Its potential clarity about its own existence is what aligns it with
higher density consciousness. If it can correctly "read"
the symbols of reality and align itself with them, even though they
are a "mask," the currents of being become stronger.
Thus
we see that this is a very decisive stage in soul-realization. And we
understand that the soul development is in the hands of the consciousness
unit itself; dependent upon its accuracy in reading the symbols and
aligning properly. This is the process of polarization.
The problem is:
the soul is "conditioned" by inbuilt patterns of survival,
ritual, reproduction and power-acquisition developed on the basis
of lower density influences, i.e. the material world, i.e. the Predator's
Mind. These are "enforced" through the basal-brain lobes
of the Reptilian complex and the correlating abdominal centers of
the autonomic currents in the mind/body.
What beckons the
3rd density consciousness is the intimations of the higher densities
of intelligence and life. These intimations can be received in varying
strengths and levels based upon the level of congruence or alignment
of the individual with the symbols of their life which are there to
inform them of what is REALLY being said at the higher levels of their
being.
So, we see that
the lessons of 4th density are these "simple understandings"
relating to correctly reading the symbols of our reality and aligning
ourselves with them by application of our knowledge and awareness.
This involves constant work in adjusting, shifting, and realigning
ourselves in experimental "feedback" maneuvers which generate
an ongoing "adventure" in God seeking.
...We may understand
the business of the densities by analogy with Rubik's Cube. The minimal
threshold level of 3rd density consciousness is like being at the
center of the Cube, which represents our "self-reflection"
in the outer world which is given to us in a maximum state of disorder.
This means that everything we perceive is received through distorted
patterns of a maze.
We must keep in
mind that this "masked pattern" of our reality is for purposes
of "catalyst," or "forced choices." Being in a
maze generates the necessity of choice. Since Unity is not perceived
in this reality, the consciousness unit, or soul, is confronted with
the requirement of assessing the implications of all interaction with
other beings and situations, and of choosing an orientation on the
basis of that personal assessment.
...Given a full
complement of rational and intuitive faculties (which self-aware consciousness
develops by trial and error in the beginning), the soul may learn
to function in alignment with an underlying principle of Unity; it
sees "difference" as many aspects of one; and each is valued.
This learning is accomplished by either experimental reflection and
analysis of consequences, or it may reject the "evidence"
of the objective reality and choose instead to cling to its own version
of "truth," seeking ever to impose this on the reality,
choosing to see that Unity can only be by elimination of difference,
the arbiter of what is the "right way," being, of course,
the subjective view of such a consciousness. [As the Cassiopaeans
describe it, it is "wishful thinking."]
...The work of
"crystallizing" these two extremes of polarization is the
real and underlying business of 3rd density. We live our myriad rounds
of incarnation through this density, preserved between incarnations
as a memory record of these identification patterns coded in the soul
matrix, in order to produce this polarization to one side of the "self"
equation or the other.
The inference
is, of course, that the "balancing" mechanism of karma does
not merely serve the "rectification" process of our many
spiritual teachings, but actually serve to harmonize the soul in objective
understanding of Unity of all, or to consolidate a contractile soul
that refuses repeatedly to see "difference" as many aspects
of the One, and chooses instead to seek to make all One by eliminating
differences.
The level of ability
of a soul to align in one way or the other via WILL, is the measure
of it's "harvestability" to 4th density at the end of each
Master Cycle which, according to many sources, is the period in which
we live at present.
"Harvestability"
is the manifest "ripeness" of the soul to proceed by virtue
of the intensity with which it holds its view of reality. This means
that subjective, one pointed devotion to Love of Self, manifested
as preference of the self's view of reality over and above whatever
the objective reality may actually manifest, is capable of achieving
a dedicated integration. It is as though such a soul makes absolutely
no attempt to sort and work with the confused faces of Rubik's Cube;
it makes no effort to learn how to work with the symbols, but steadfastly
recoils in the center of the cube, BELIEVING that the faces of the
cube are aligned and that it's belief makes it an objective FACT.
[This is the essence
of Love of Self. And such a consciousness backs its choice by "godly"
justifications. It seeks to be "saved," i.e. have the cube
aligned FOR it by an outside agency that will come rushing to its
aid if it manifests enough "love" and "faith"
with its "open and bleeding heart." And this is where we
come back to the remark made above by the Cassiopaeans: "When
you assume that capture and imprisonment of those of lesser capacity
than you is for 'the good,' why should not you expect those of greater
capacity than you to assume the same regarding you?!"]
Such a soul, persisting
in its "love and faith" against the clues and hints of the
symbol system of reality, is wide open for subsumation into a hierarchy
of beings who are firmly convinced that what they are doing is "for
the good of humanity." [Extracted from: Will, Being and
Well Being]
And it is in this
context that such beings have "created" and disseminated such
spiritual and religious beliefs such as "suffering will earn you
a place in heaven," or "turn the other cheek," or "give
until it hurts," or "your faith will make you whole,"
and on and on.
Now, notice that
I did not include such things as "love your enemy, bless those
that persecute you," because, in the larger sense, the soul that
chooses to serve others, that chooses to see Unity in difference will
naturally love the "enemy" and will "bless" persecutors.
He will just see them as one face of the cube, part of the whole, and
not necessarily the face that he wishes to align with or give energy
to.
So, once the orientation
is chosen - ipso facto by repeated actions through many incarnations
- the soul is then graduated to 4th density where, the lessons have
to do with Love and Understanding. It is there that this is distilled
and purified according to orientation! At 4th density, the nature of
the density is LOVE of the One Infinite Creator in terms of either one's
subjective view, or the objective reality. The general rule of "Love
God," reaches all densities. It is at 3rd density that everything
is masked so that the soul must choose based on how it develops - and
how it develops is based on how it chooses. As these choices "add
up," the soul becomes "ripe" in loving God as Self, or
loving Others as both God and Self.
At 4th density,
the purpose of both polarities is the same: to seek a degree of intensification
and alignment with their chosen version of "love." The difference
is, the STS polarity seeks to absorb or "eat" love energy.
The very "atmosphere" of 4th density is that of LOVE. And
when any 3rd density being establishes contact with the higher densities
by intensification of subjective faith, the natural inflow of energies
will be perceived as overwhelming LOVE.
They seek to promote
the "open heart and love" approach because this is what FEEDS
them. Their own choice of Love of self and imposition of their subjective
view is a from of projection that requires massive amounts of energy
to maintain.
This idea will be
disturbing to those individuals who believe that their "challenges"
to spiritual or higher density beings, or their "open hearts"
and "love natures" are a kind of talisman, or a universal
"sign of the cross" that will automatically repel negativity
and send it fleeing. But it seems that the evidence shows that higher
density beings are not so constrained. The STS beings of 4th density
rely on the general Love-feeling of that density to confuse the issue,
to fool the bedeviled mind into taking psychological refuge in such
a premise that will actually serve to further encourage the acceptance
of the idea that they have the "good of humanity" at heart.
What is FELT in the presence of ANY 4th density being, whether it is
Serving Self or Others, is the informing quality of the density through
which they function, i.e. the Love density. This Love-unity-FEELING
is the pervasive property of that density, NOT the personal expression
of the beings.
We then come to
the problem of why otherwise "STO" sources will say that nothing
negative can graduate to the higher levels of being and development.
Are they lying?
This conforms to
a certain belief pattern prevalent in New Age circles. It is also used
and supplemented by many channeled sources which take the "see
no evil" approach. This doctrine posits that where there is no
knowledge of negativity, negativity does not exist. This in turn links
to the corollary that "your create your own reality" by what
you admit to exist.
We quickly see that
this takes us back to the recoiled soul in the middle of the Rubik's
Cube of awareness, willfully refusing to see the jumble of patterns,
and demanding that the universe, or God, or whoever, come and fix the
blasted thing according to his belief that it ought to be all nicely
arranged so that all the colors are together on each side. Never mind
that the universe or God doesn't actually do this, the soul deliberately
works to "grow" his belief so strong that he will SEE it as
"fixed," and by doing this will have crystallized his will
to the point of being harvested to 4th density STS.
As mentioned above,
it is unlikely that any of us would ever be fooled again by another
Hitler. But, curiously, we are blind to such things in spiritual terms.
When it comes to negativity of a spiritual nature, or what we might
call evil, many people assume that things of the spirit and principles
of the material world have different roots and are, therefore, not comparable
as we have been told in the Hermetic Maxim: As above, so below.
The idea that higher
density beings can be as compartmentalized and varied in their perspectives
and objectives - only to a degree of greater intensity and ability -
is positively NOT part of the perspective of many people who simply
refuse to admit such a possibility.
The very idea of
this makes many people experience such a hollow and heavy sensation
in the pit of their stomach that they are sure that their "gut
feelings" are showing them that it is a lie. It's bad enough to
be transparent to the eyes of a Benevolent Being at higher levels; it
is quite another kettle of fish to have to confront the idea of incredibly
concentrated malevolent intelligence of a predatory wisdom that is far
more than a match for any 3rd density mentality. And worse yet, such
beings can move through our reality, unseen and unfelt, to "whisper
hemlock sweet words" into our defenseless ears while at the same
time manipulating with "subliminal ease" all our complex chemistry
and thinking, so that they can, effectively," breach the barriers
of our crude subjective focus without so much as registering a blink
in our warning systems." [cf. Topper]
So unacceptable
is this prospect to the 3rd density EGO, ruled by anxiety, that it panics
and pushes the VETO button, foaming at the mouth in denial, reaching
in frenzy for every holy word of whatever denomination was inculcated
in childhood that clearly states that "only the good" pass
on to the higher worlds.
When faced with
such an idea, even if we have given up "churchianity," we
will flee to the sources that tell us that "negative values and
thoughts of warfare can't be brought along to the higher realms."
Such sources would have us believe that the common denominator of higher
levels compels conscious conformance to the value of Unity.
For some, the very
fact that a "higher being" would even speak about anything
negative in any context, is proof that they are a negative being or
a Satanically deluded lower astral "spirit." Because, of course,
all "higher beings" are so purified that such "words"
cannot pass their ephemeral lips without choking them.
Such a doctrine
has no idea of what to do with an evil that isn't simply "relative
to cultural context" or "evil by comparative definition,"
or is "evil because of ignorance," but is, on the contrary,
very conscious, very intentional, very malevolent and cunning to a level
that cannot be plumbed by 3rd density awareness.
Does that scare
you? It ought to. But not so that you will run and hide or live in terror,
or dive into denial. It ought to galvanize you to do what is appropriate
to the situation - LEARN all you can so that you are better equipped
to utilize reason and analysis and observation in order to make your
choices more congruent with your internal alignment.
Does it scare you
to think that the medical system in the Western world may be approaching
healing in the wrong way; that your doctor, despite his best intentions,
may have been educated and brainwashed into a system that does NOT promote
health? If you are ill and need treatment, and you know that your doctor
might kill you, or do irreparable harm to you, do you just go into denial
about your sickness and sit there and die? Or do you begin to learn
all you can about your illness, the many varied treatment methods that
might be available in other forms of healing, and possibly take responsibility
for your own wellness by making some decisions as to what treatments
you will implement in your own life? And, if you are stymied or blocked
in this endeavor, will you just give up and "take the only medicine
available" and possibly die?
Now, here at Cassiopaea,
we have never asked anybody to believe anything. We simply have the
idea that human beings worldwide have a right to know what MAY be going
on, and a possible interpretation of things that have puzzled human
beings for a very long time.
We also wish to
observe that the greatest minds of history have sought to work through
and explain this issues for millennia with little success. And, for
the most part, they have taken the route of "faith in the goodness
of higher beings who will take care of us if we pray and are long-suffering."
While we think that such efforts are laudable, we also think that they
are bound by their own self-defined limitations and are thereby prevented
from disseminating information that can make a real difference. Their
track records speak for themselves if the individual will take the time
to stop listening to the propaganda and look at the "fruits."
When we began to
share this information, very few people took it seriously. Now it seems
that many others are "jumping on the bandwagon" and approaching
it with the idea of generating fear for its own sake. That has never
been the objective of the Cassiopaeans. They say Knowledge Protects.
And it is in this present work that it will become clear, in the most
exact terms, how this is true to a level hardly imagined by the reader
up to this point.
Here at Cassiopaea
we have accumulated information that suggests that the human population
on this planet has been subjected for many thousands of years to intense
manipulation by "alien" forces through human agents, if not
directly. The Cassiopaeans do not take the view that these "aliens"
are of the 3rd density type; i.e. that they are necessarily travelers
from different star systems who are, more or less, as "physical"
as we are, and with whom we can engage on any kind of equal footing
in OUR terms. However, they have been teaching us that we CAN generate
our own protection in higher level terms, and that this protection is
a kind of awareness that is generated as "knowledge" is applied.
How and why this works is going to become evident to the reader as we
examine the inner workings and hidden mechanisms of the Matrix reality.
The ancient Sumerians
claimed that the human race was created to be a slave race, a food source,
and a genetic pool for "higher beings," the Annunaki. The
Cassiopaeans confirm that we were "altered" for this purpose,
having been "created" or embodied for altogether different
reasons that did not include being "food."
Q: (L) The Sumerian
story of the creation of human beings involves a story where they
say they killed a god and mixed his blood and parts to mix with mud
and then planted it in these female "gestation" goddesses and that
this is where the human race came from. Now, this sounds an awful
lot like what the "Grays" are doing at the present time. Did someone
actually kill a "god", break his soul in pieces, and thereby make
the human race?
A: Symbolism and not correct event sequence. Lizard beings genetically
altering the human race after battle for their own feeding purposes.
Q: (L) When did these events that these Sumerian stories are talking
about take place?
A: 309000 years ago, approx.
Q: (L) So, it happened so long ago that these stories have lost the
truth?
A: Reflection passed down through psychic memory channel.
However,
the Cassiopaeans have made it clear that this is NOT total control:
Q: (L) At one
point in a previous transmission it was stated that the Lizard beings
altered the human race after a battle for their own "feeding" purposes.
Could you clarify this?
A: It would not be possible for these beings to completely control
your existence. If it were you would not be able to do the things
your race has done. There has been interference by the Lizard beings
in the physical structure of the human beings for their own benefit.
Remember what we told you before. They have been interfering with
the time cycle experienced on this plane, for quite some time as you
measure it. For 74 thousand years they have been interfering in a
backwards and forwards time reference manner in order to set up circumstances
that they perceive to be beneficial for them in the measure of time
that you would consider to be forward, that is, in the future. They
have been going backwards and forwards in time to do this. They are
suspended in the time cycle as they do this. So what they perceive
as being your equivalent of one hour could be as long as 74 thousand
years.
Q: (L) So they haven't been here for 300 thousand years?
A: They originally set up circumstances for their benefit 309 thousand
years ago, however, they have been using the particular bracketed
period of the 74 thousand year period alter things in all the various
ways mentioned earlier.
The
idea of a "battle" having been fought over the human race is
a very ancient idea expressed in many religious parables:
Q: (L) What was
the true event behind the story of the "Mark of Cain?"
A: Advent of jealousy.
Q: (L) What occurred to allow jealousy to enter into human interaction?
A: Lizard takeover.
Q: (L) Wasn't the Lizard takeover an event that occurred at the time
of the fall of Eden?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was this story of Cain and Abel part of that takeover?
A: Symbolism of story.
Q: (L) This was symbolic of the Lizzie takeover, the advent of jealousy,
and the attitude of brother against brother, is that correct?
A: Partly. The mark of Cain means the "jealousy factor" of change
facilitated by Lizard takeover of earth's vibrational frequency. Knot
on spine is physical residue of DNA restriction deliberately added
by Lizards. See?
Q: (L) Okay, Jan is going to move her hand up my back and you tell
her when to stop at the "knot."
A: Okay.
Q: (L) You mean the [area of the] occipital ridge?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What was the configuration of the spine and skull prior to
this addition?
A: Spine had no ridge there. Jealousy emanates from there, you can
even feel it.
Q: (L) Do any of these emotions that we have talked about that were
generated by DNA breakdown, were any of these related to what Carl
Sagan discusses when he talks about the "Reptilian Brain"?
A: In a roundabout way.
Q: (L) Okay, at the time this "Mark of Cain" came about, were there
other humans on the planet that did not have this configuration?
A: It was added to all simultaneously.
Q: (L) How did they physically go about performing this act? What
was the mechanism of this event, the nuts and bolts of it?
A: Are you ready? DNA core is as yet undiscovered enzyme relating
to carbon. Light waves were used to cancel the first ten factors of
DNA by burning them off. At that point, a number of physical changes
took place including knot at top of spine. Each of these is equally
reflected in the ethereal.
Q: (L) Well, the question I do have is, how many people were there
on the planet and did they have to take each one and do this individually?
[...] There were [however] many people on the planet, how did they
effect this change on all of them?
A: Light wave alteration.
Q: (L) And light waves, actual light waves, affect DNA?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) What was the origin of the light waves?
A: Our center. ...Our realm. STO.
Q: (L) So, how did the Lizzies use the light from the Service to Others
realm...
A: They used sophisticated technology to interrupt light frequency
waves.
Q: (L) Well, what I am getting out of this that you are saying from
what you are not saying is that it was almost like,... well, was there
a battle and you guys lost?
A: Yes.
[...]
Q: (T) I'm trying to. Now, another force in what we term as the past,
defeated you and used the power of the light in order to alter us
in different ways, is this correct?
A: Yes. Now understand this: It is all part of natural grand cycle.
Q: (L) If this is all a part of a natural grand cycle, and correct
me if I am wrong here, it almost seems as if you guys, the "good guys",
and the other "bad" guys, that you just really kind of go at it just
for fun, is that true?
A: No.
Q: (L) But you say it is a natural thing or part of a natural grand
cycle. Is this natural grand cycle just part of the interaction between
light and darkness which just simply must be?
A: Yes. We are at "front line" of universe's natural system of balance.
That is where one rises to before reaching total union of "The One".
6th level.
[...]
Q : (T) Now, the battle you had with the other side...
A: Are having.
Q: (T) This battle goes on... do you have the light power back?
A: [We] Never lost it, you did.
Q: (T) Okay, I guess that for us the Lizzies are the main force even
though they have others on their side...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) They took our light, not yours?
A: Not against you. Currently in union with you.
Q: (T) So we are but one battle in the universe in an overall, ongoing
struggle?
A: Yes. Balance is natural. Remember, it's all just lessons in the
grand cycle.
Q: (L) I am really curious... when you guys and the Lizzies "go to
it", what do you do? I mean, you obviously don't shoot guns at each
other and you don't have tanks...
A: Too complicated for you to possibly understand because you are
not at 4th level yet.
Q: (J) When you are fighting, is it any way at all possible for us
to detect the battle?
A: First: We don't "fight." Second, yes; it's nature as in meteorology
and earth changes.
Q: (T) Your form of confrontation takes the form of physical changes
in the atmosphere and environment of the planet?
A: And in space.
Q: (T) But that is how we detect it? The more activity, the more conflict
is going on?
A: Remember, we are the light. They are the dark. We are both high
level thought forms reflected at all levels of reality.
Q: (T) So, what we perceive, then, is what comes through to third
density which is not what we would perceive if we were looking at
it from 4th or 5th or 6th.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Isn't it a little unfair for you guys, at 6th level, to take
on the Lizzies at only 4th level?
A: The "Lizzies" are the 4th level representatives of the forces of
the darkness not the 6th level, and you are 3rd level representatives.
Q: (L) Is there a 6th level representative of the forces of darkness?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what is this 6th level representative known as, or called,
or look like or whatever?
A: Orion in your "neighborhood."
Q: (L) The Orion's are 6th level STS beings?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are they like you, thought forms?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do they ever appear in physical matter?
A: Can.
Q: (L) And they are the driving force that controls the Lizzies?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is there some intermediary between the 6th level Orions and
the 4th level Lizzies, such as a 5th level force or being?
A: 5th level is contemplation zone for both "sides".
Q: (L) Does that mean that at the contemplation level that there is
no activity? (J) Is it like a "time out?"
A: Close. Balancer.
Q: (L) Is there a 3rd level representative of the forces of the light?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Who or what are they?
A: Don't exist on your planet.
Q: (L) Do they have a planet of their own?
A: Have quadrillions of them.
Q: (L) Well, this is beginning to sound like we are in pretty bad
shape here. This is like the Siberia of the universe as Gurdjieff
said.
A: The Universe is infinitely huge.
Q: (L) If there are planets with STO beings...
A: Some look like you.
So
we see that thinking about the "takeover" and "manipulation"
of humanity in 3rd density terms of a "battle" is not
quite the issue in the Cosmic Terms of "Warfare." And it is
in these terms that we need to begin to think. It is in 4th density terms
that we will come to understand how truly Knowledge Protects.
Q: (L) At one
point we were told that time was an illusion that came into being
at the "time" of the "Fall" in Eden, and this was said in such a way
that I inferred that there were other illusions put into place at
that time...
A: Time is an illusion that works for you because of your altered
DNA state.
Q: (L) Okay, what other illusions?
A: Monotheism, the belief in one separate, all powerful entity.
Q: (T) Is "separate" the key word in regard to Monotheism?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is another one of the illusions?
A: The need for physical aggrandizement.
Q: (L) What is another of the illusions?
A: Linear focus.
Q: (L) Anything else at this time?
A: Unidimensionality.
Q: (L) The veil... (J) The perception of only one dimension... (L)
Were these illusions programmed into us genetically through our DNA?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Can you tell us a little bit about how these illusions are
enforced on us, how they are perceived by us?
A: If someone opens a door, and behind it you see a pot of gold, do
you worry whether there is a poisonous snake behind the door hidden
from view, before you reach for the pot of gold?
Q: (L) What does the gold represent?
A: Temptation to limitation.
[...]
Q: (L) So what you are saying to us is that the story of the temptation
in Eden was the story of Humankind being led into this reality as
a result of being tempted. So, the eating of the fruit of the Tree
of Knowledge of Good and Evil was...
A: Giving into temptation.
Q: (L) And this was a trick...
A: No! Tricks don't exist!
Q: (T) Okay, no trick, a trap?
A: No! Traps don't exist either. Free will could not be abridged if
you had not obliged.
Q: (T) What were we before the "Fall?"
A: 3rd density STO.
Q: (T) We are STS at this point because of what happened then?
A: Yes.
[...]
Q: (T) We were 3rd density STO at that time. Was this after the battle
that had transpired? In other words, were we, as a 3rd density race,
literally on our own at that point, as opposed to before?
A: Was battle.
Q: (L) The battle was in us?
A: Through you.
Q: (T) The battle was through us as to whether we would walk through
this doorway... (L) The battle was fought through us, we were literally
the battleground. (T) Was the battle over whether or not we walked
through that door?
A: Close.
Q: (T) Okay, we were STO at that point. You have said before that
on this density we have the choice of being STS or STO.
A: Oh Terry, the battle is always there, it's "when" you choose that
counts!
[...]
Q: (T) This must tie into why the Lizards and other aliens keep telling
people that they have given their consent for abduction and so forth.
We were STO and now we are STS.
A: Yes, ... "When" you went for the gold, you said "Hello" to the
Lizards and all that that implies.
Q: (T) ...By going for the gold, we became STS beings because going
for the gold was STS.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And, in doing so, we ended up aligning ourselves with the 4th
density Lizard Beings...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Because they are 4th density beings and they have a lot more
abilities than we at 3rd density...
A: You used to be aligned with 4th density STO.
Q: (T) And we were 3rd density STO. But, by going for the gold we
aligned ourselves with 4th density STS.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And by doing so we gave 4th density STS permission to do whatever
they wish with us?
A: Close.
Q: (T) So, when they tell us that we gave them permission to abduct
us, it is this they are referring to?
A: Close.
Q: (J) Go back to what they said before: "Free will could not be abridged
if you had not obliged." (T) We, as the human race, used our free
will to switch from STO to STS. (L) So, at some level we have chosen
the mess we are in and that is the Super Ancient Legend of the Fallen
Angel, Lucifer. That is us. We fell by falling into that door, so
to speak, going after the pot of gold, and when we fell through the
door, the serpent bit us!
A: But this is a repeating syndrome.
Q: (L) Is it a repeating syndrome just for the human race or is it
a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation?
A: It is the latter.
Q: (L) Is this a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation simply
because it is the cyclic nature of things? Or is it as the Indians
call it, Maya?
A: Either or.
So, we find that
there is a huge element of free will involved in making the choice to
"fall." The only problem is, the consequences of this choice
were not understood due to a lack of knowledge. Another thing that is
generally misunderstood is the possibilities of living in a state of
3rd density STO. It is clearly not the same as living in 3rd density
STS in a LOT of ways! The problem seems to have been that the effects
of the material universe - entering into a 3rd density physical body
for purposes of "learning" and more rapid development - is
the "pot of gold" that humanity "reached for."
Q: (L) Can a spiritual
being become entrapped in physical matter?
A: It's possible but very unlikely.
Q: (L) Are human beings entrapped in physical matter?
A: By choice.
Q: (L) Why did they make this choice?
A: To experience physical sensations. It was a group mind decision.
Q: (L) Who was in charge of the group?
A: The group. [...] Everything that exists in all realms of the universe
can experience existence in one of only two ways. That would be defined
as a long wave cycle and a short wave cycle. Going back to your previous
question about why humans are "entrapped" in physical existence, which,
of course, is voluntary and chosen, this was due to the desire to
change from the long wave cycle experience of completely - what you
would call - ethereal or spiritual existence, to the short wave cycle
of what you call physical existence. The difference is that a long
wave cycle involves only very gradual change in evolution in a cyclical
manner. Whereas a short wave cycle involves a duality. And this is
the case with souls in physical bodies as is experienced on this earth
plane because the soul experiences an ethereal state for half the
cycle and a physical state for the other half of the cycle. While
these halves are not measured in time the way you measure time, the
totality of experience is equal in each half. The necessity to
form the short wave cycle was brought about through nature through
the natural bounds of the universe when the group mind of souls chose
to experience physicality as opposed to a completely ethereal existence.
The key term in
the above remarks is "desire." The Group DESIRED to change
to a cycle that includes physical existence. Now, the question becomes:
WHY would this be seen as desirable? The Cassiopaeans have said that
this was because the physical life experience of duality was seen to
provide: :
...An increase
in relative energy which speeds up the learning process of the soul
and all of it's one dimensional and two dimensional interactive partners.
In other words, flora and fauna, minerals, etc. All experience
growth and movement towards reunion at a faster rate on the cycle
through this short wave cycle physical/ethereal transfer.
So,
we see that this "desire for the gold" was also a desire to
change the rate of movement towards reunion with the One. Of course, it
was thought that this could be done in a "safe" and moderated
manner. The "dangers" of physical existence were not fully appreciated:
Q: (L) Did, at
any time, the human race live for a long time in an Edenic state,
where they were able to use bodies and still have a spiritual connection?
A: Yes. But not long. No addiction takes long to close the circle.
Q: (L) So, mankind was addicted to pleasuring the self?
A: Became quickly.
But
that this was a progression over aeons is made clear in the following:
Q: (L) A reader
writes: "I can't reconcile the idea of our being trapped or lured
(by sensuality) into a physical state with the idea that we have progressed
through the vegetative and animal states." This is a good question.
It seems that the energy of creation has progressed through the vegetative
and animal states, that animals can graduate to third density and
become human, just as humans can graduate to 4th density. How do we
reconcile this with the idea that human souls were entrapped into
third density bodies from 4th density, by the Lizards? Are we talking
about two different functions? Two different groups?
A: Humans were not entrapped by the "Lizards."
Q: (B) We volunteered! (L) Well, they did say that the Lizards were
waiting for the right soul matrix to "step in." So, we were the right
soul matrix and we stepped into these engineered bodies that the Lizards
created. That's what you said. So, how do we reconcile us stepping
into these engineered third density bodies with soul evolution through
the vegetative and animal states?
A: If you look more closely at the material, it was not stated that
the consciousness levels currently represented by humans and many
others "stepped into" anything in particular but PHYSICALITY. Individual
consciousness units stepped into different physical forms. Some "stepped"
in as humans right off the bat, and some chose otherwise. It is simply
that the "choice" to experience physicality in many forms,
was simultaneous, though different "units" have participated
in different ways at different stages, rather than in a linear progression.
This same idea has
been expressed by the Cassiopaeans in terms of the "Big Bang"
as being this emergence of consciousness into physicality rather than
the "beginning" of the physical universe in Darwinian terms.
Q: (L) Is there
only one ultimate creator of the universe
A: All is one. And one is all.
Q: (L) From the one what was the first division?
A: Mass division and disbursement.
Q: (L) Was this simultaneous?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was this what we refer to as the "Big Bang?"
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is there any reference to this event in terms of time?
A: Always.
Q: (L) Can we say that all that exists in the material universe is,
say, "x" number of years old?
A: No. It is the eternal now. Not only did happen, is happening
and going to happen. The expanded presence.
We can also think
of this process of "stepping into matter" in terms of the
story of the Prodigal Son. In this story, the young man took his inheritance
and went to a "distant country" where he wasted his fortune in reckless
and loose living. And, it just so happened that at the same time that
he ran out of money, a terrible famine came upon the land and he was
unable to make his way by working. He then attached himself to a citizen
of that country who set him to work tending the pigs, and he ended up
eating with the pigs. Then, he came to himself and realized that even
his father's servants were better off than he, and he decided to go
home and beg his father's forgiveness and offer to be a servant.
So, he went home.
But, while he was a far way off, his father saw him and ran to meet
him, and embraced him with pity and tenderness, made the feast, and
so forth. You know the story: the "fatted calf" and all that.
Well, what we are
learning here is that the human race is a fragmented soul unit and this
story is about us. We are the Prodigal Son, we are Lucifer, the fallen
Angel, we are Toto and Dorothy carried to Oz by the tornado because
we "desired" to speed things up. And, the image of the son
wasting all his wealth is the description of the fragmenting of the
being of which each of us is a part.
But Oz, the "distant
country," the realms of physical reality exist as part of the cyclical
nature of the Cosmos and is represented in the many ancient depictions
of God as a two-faced being. The word Matter is related to Mother, and
the physical universe is the great womb of the Cosmos/Prime Creator,
into which the sperm/creative consciousness of Prime Creator is disbursed,
and from which can be born Sons of God. Matter is not evil, though from
our perspective we may view our experiences here as "evil."
These ideas are
not new; they have been suggested in one form or another by many others
in the past. The outline of these stories is that during the times before
the actual physical manifestation of mankind in the earth plane, there
was much "experimentation" with forms which could be used
for the development of consciousness. As this activity proceeded, many
souls became "fascinated" by their own thought creations -
they wished to better understand the three dimensions they had manifested
and there was a consequent movement, or projection of spirit force into
the physical expressions.
Many souls entered
into plants and animals for the sheer joy of experience. As they did
so, they found that their force was drawn within and concentrated in
the periphery of the body inhabited. This created a uniquely intense
experience so that it was sought and repeated over and over again. As
this was repeated, it caused a reaction in the spiritual energies which
was to crystallize, in a manner of speaking, in three dimensions. This
crystallization became, a sort of veil between consciousness and soul
energy.
As souls "forgot
their source," they created energy imbalances by acting in ways
which did not consider the free will and choice of others.
This was earthy
prior to modern man. And here is where the story gets interesting. It
is revealed by many sources that a group of beings not engaged in this
activity - that is, physical/material existence - sought to create a
way to heighten the energies and perceptions of those who had become
entrapped in the cycle of reincarnation which was the result of the
imbalance created by separation of consciousness and soul energy. A
physical form was directly manifested to accommodate this purpose, and
this physical form was modern man. And here, of course, is where it
gets tricky as well due to all the inversions and distortion of the
events by those with less than our best interests at heart. Apparently,
this directly manifested creation is the one that was "taken over"
and altered resulting in the "Legends of the Fall."
Q: (L) Well, then
how did mankind come to be here?
A: Combination of factors. Numerous souls desired physical existence
then was altered by three forces including principally Lizards through
Grays, Nephalim and Orion union.
[...]
Q: (L) ...You said numerous souls desired physical existence. When
the numerous souls did this, how did physical existence come to be?
A: First was apelike.
Q: (L) And then what happened? Did these apelike being just pop into
the air? What did the souls do with these apelike beings?
A: Souls altered them by transfer.
Q: (L) Transfer of what?
A: Souls into seeded bodies. Orion Union was first [to put souls]
into Neanderthal. ...Put humans there for incubation process.
Q: (L) Were altered ape embryos put back into ape females for gestation?
A: No. Souls only.
Q: (L) They put the souls into the ape bodies?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Did the soul's presence in the ape body cause its genetics
and DNA to change?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) They entered into living creatures on this planet to experience
3 d reality and by entering in caused mutation?
A: Yes.
[...]
Q: (L) Where did the souls come from that entered into the bodies
on the planet earth? Were they in bodies on other planets before they
came here?
A: Not this group.
Q: (L) Were they just floating around in the universe somewhere?
A: In union with the One. Have you heard the Super ancient legend
of Lucifer, the Fallen Angel?
Q: (L) Who is Lucifer?
A: You. The human race.
Q: (L) Are the souls of individual humans the parts of a larger soul?
A: Yes. Close. The One. All who have fallen must learn "the hard way."
Q: (L) Are you saying that the act of wanting to experience physical
reality is the act of falling?
A: You are members of a fragmented soul unit.
Q: (L) What is it about wanting to be physical is a "fall"?
A: Pleasure for the self.
At
a later time, we came back to this in more detail:
Q: Well, this
is one of the problems I am ...trying to ...understand is, prior to
the 'Fall in Eden,' mankind lived in a 4th density state. Is that
correct?
A: Semi/sort of.
Q: Please be more specific.
A: 4th density in another realm, such as time/space continuum, etc.
Q: Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle; various choices
were made: the human race went through the door after the 'gold,'
so to speak, and became aligned with the Lizzies... This resulted
in a number of effects: the breaking up of the DNA, the burning off
of the first ten factors of DNA, the separation of the hemispheres
of the brain...
A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you're gonna get dirty.
Q: What was the motivating factor for playing in the dirt? What essential
thing occurred? You said once that it was 'desire based imbalance.'
What was it a desire for?
A: Increased physicality.
Q: What was the objective sought for in this desire for increased
physicality?
A: Sensate.
Q: How was sensate experienced so that these beings had an idea that
they could get more if they increased their physicality?
A: Not experienced, demonstrated.
Q: Demonstrated how, by who?
A: Do you not know?
Q: It was demonstrated by the Lizzies?
A: Basically.
Q: Demonstrated in what way? Did they say: 'here, try this!' Or did
they demonstrate by showing or doing?
A: Closer to the latter.
Q: They were doing, experimenting, playing, and saying: 'look, we
are doing this, it's so great, come here and try it?'
A: Not really. More like: "you could have this."
Q: What seemed to be so desirable about this increased physicality
when they said 'you can have this?'
A: Use your imagination!
Q: Was there any understanding, or realization of any kind, that increased
physicality could be like Osiris lured into his own coffin by Set?
That they would then slam the lid shut and nail him in?
A: Obviously, such understanding was lacking.
Q: Sounds like a pretty naive bunch! Does the lack of this understanding
reflect a lack of knowledge?
A: Of course. But more, it is desire getting in the way of...
[...]
Q: Okay. The 'Fall' occurred. It seems like, and some of the archaeological
studies indicate, that for many thousands of years, there was a peaceful
existence and a nice agrarian society where the goddess or female
creative forces were worshipped. At least, this is what a lot of present-day
books are proposing...
A: No. These events took place 309000 years ago, as you measure it.
This is when the first prototype of what you call "modern man" was
created. The controllers had the bodies ready, they just needed the
right soul matrix to agree to "jump in."
[...]
Q: So, was there any kind of worship of God, or religious activity
in this pre-Fall state; this Edenic, semi-4th density state?
A: No need when one has a clue.
Q: ...Okay, we had these guys; they fell from Eden, but they were
still fairly close to the original concepts, in some terms. Once they
jumped into the physical bodies, as you put it, what was their level
of conceptualization regarding the universe? Did they still retain
some understanding at that point?
A: Kind of like the understanding one has after severe head trauma,
vis a vis your normal understanding in your current state.
Q: So, they were traumatized; they may have had bits and pieces of
ideas and memories, but they may also have lost a great deal altogether.
There may have even been a sort of "coma" state of mankind for many
millennia. But, after they woke up, with the bits and pieces floating
around in their heads, they may have begun to attempt to piece it
all together. So, they started putting it all back together. What
was the first thing they put together regarding the cosmos around
them?
A: Sex.
Q: What did they decide about sex? I mean, sex was there. They were
having sex. Is that it? Or, did they understand the cosmos as sex?
A: More like the former. After all, that is what got you guys in this
mess in the first place! Just imagine the sales job if you can: "Look
how much fun this is! Want to try it?!? Oops, sorry, we forgot to
tell you, you cannot go back!"
Q: I really fail to understand - and I know it is a big issue that
has been hinted at and alluded to, and outright claims have been made
regarding sex in all religions and mythologies - but I fail to understand
the mechanics of how this can be the engineering of a 'fall.' What,
precisely, are the mechanics of it? What energy is generated? How
is it generated? What is the conceptualization of the misuse of this
energy, or the use of the energy?
A: It is simply the introduction of the concept of self-gratification
of a physical sort.
Q: On many occasions you have said that the ideal thing is to have
perfect balance of physicality and ethereality. This has been said
on a number of occasions. Now, I don't understand how it can be that
gratification of a physical body can be the mechanics by which one
is entrapped? Is it not gratifying to look at something beautiful?
Is it wrong, sinful, or a form of a fall, to look at beauty, to hear
something beautiful such as music, or to touch something that is sensually
delightful such as a piece of silk or the skin of a loved one? These
various things that the human being derives pleasure from very often
elevate them to a spiritual state.
A: Possession is the key. In STS, you possess. ...If you move
through the beautiful flowers, the silk, the skin of another, but
do not seek to possess...
Q: It seems to me that it is possible to experience all of these things,
including sex, without the need or desire to possess; only to give.
In which case, I still don't understand how it can be a mechanism
for a 'fall.'
A: If it is desired, then the mechanism is not to give. Do
you eat a piece of chocolate cake because it is good to give to the
stomach?
Q: Well, you could!
A: No, in STS, which is your realm do not forget, one gives because
of the pleasant sensation which results.
Q: Could it not be said that, if everything that exists is part of
God, including the flesh, that if one gives to the flesh, without
being attached to the giving, that it could be considered a giving
to the 'All?'
A: Explain the process.
Q: For example: there are some people who like to suffer, because
they believe that the flesh is sinful. That is a big thing that the
Lizzies have instituted. For centuries they have wanted people to
suffer, and they have made this big deal about sex and anything that
might be considered pleasant or desirable should be denied, and that
a person should suffer, and revel in their suffering. And, actually,
making a person...
A: If one seeks to suffer, they do so in expectation of future reward.
They desire to possess something in the end.
Q: What I am saying is: if a person can simply BE, in the doing and
being of who and what they are, in simplicity; to become involved
in doing everything as a meditation, or as a consecration, whether
they are walking down the street and being at one with the air, the
sunshine, the birds and trees and other people; in this state of oneness,
doesn't that constitute a giving to the universe as giving oneself
up as a channel for the universe to experience all these things?
A: Not if one is "feeling this oneness."
Q: We are what we are. Nature is nature. Progression is progression.
And if people would just relax and be who and what they are in honesty,
and do what is according to their nature without violating the Free
Will of others, that this is a more pure form of being than doing
things out of any feeling of expectation, or desire; to just BE, not
want... just BE?
A: Yes, but STS does not do that.
Q: (A) From which I draw conclusions: if there STS around us, we cannot
just...
A: You are all STS. If you were not, you would not be where you are.
Q: (A) There are those who are happy in the STS mode; and there are
those who are trying to get out of the STS mode...
A: STO candidate.
Q: (A) These STO candidates cannot just simply BE, even theoretically,
because then, STS would eat them.
A: No.
Q: Why not?
A: STS does not eat according to protocol. ...STS "eats" whatever
it wants to, if it is able.
Q: That's what we said. If you are STO in an STS world, you are basically
defenseless and they eat you.
A: No.
Q: Why? What makes STO unavailable or 'inedible?'
A: Frequency resonance not in sync.
Q: (A) But then, that would mean that all these people who are saying
that we need just to love everything and everybody, are right. They
just be, and love, don't do anything, just give everything to the
Lizzies... they are right!
A: No, because motivation is STS.
Q: How is the motivation to love everything and everybody, and to
just give, STS?
A: Feels good.
Q: So, they want to do it because it feels good?
A: Want is an STS concept.
Q: So, you seem to be suggesting that the real trick is to just become
non-attached to anything and anybody, do nothing, and just dissolve
into nothing? No thought, no want, no do, no be, no anything!
A: If you are STS, that does not fit, but, if you did exactly that,
you would reincarnate in an STO realm, where such energy does fit.
Q: But, if you have become nothing, how do you reincarnate? And, when
you say 'reincarnate,' that implies being in a body!
A: You do not become nothingness.
Q: But, being incarnated means being in a body?
A: No.
Q: You mean moving into a realm that does not necessarily mean being
in a body?
A: Close. But 4th density STO is partially physical. Does not consume
nor possess.
[...]
Q: So, prior to this time, this prior Edenic state...
A: Was more like 4th density.
Q: But that implies that there was some level of physicality. Was
there physicality in the sense of bodies that look like present-day
humans?
A: Not quite.
Q: What did these pre-fall...
A: Cannot answer because it is too complex for you to understand.
Q: Does this mean that the bodies we possibly would move into, or
morph into, as 4th density beings, assuming that one does, would also
be too complex for us to understand? You are saying that this 'sort
of 4th density' pre-Fall state, in terms of the physical bodies, is
too complex to understand. If going back to 4th density is anything
like coming from 4th density, does that mean that what we would go
back to is something that is too complex to understand? This variability
of physicality that you have described?
A: Yes.
Now, I hope that
you noted all the references to "feeling" that were put in
bold type. These are all clues that I am setting in the background for
the reader to keep in mind as we move into the discussion that is going
to be, for some (as it was for me), rather distressing. But, there is
one more thing I want to bring in before we get down to business here.
We note that the Cassiopaeans have said that the first prototype of
modern man was created or "engineered" 300,000 years ago by
genetic mixing with Neanderthal types. The "right soul matrix"
was found, and "jumped in" and altered the DNA by the soul's
presence. The reader may enjoy having a look at The Neandertal
Enigma which investigates the strange mystery of the Neanderthals
who suddenly disappeared at the time of the appearance of modern man.
What happened to them and why is a very great mystery and the terms
of understanding this enigma change almost daily. This event is generally
dated, by various dating processes, to have occurred 35,000 years ago.
However, in the above referenced work there are mysterious appearances
of "modern type" man in several places and times long before
this date that are yet to be explained. As soon as you have finished
The Neandertal Enigma, you might want to then read Shattering
the Myths of Darwinism for a better perspective on the issues,
though I am not saying that either of them have the answer.
We need to note
that there is a difference between what the Cassiopaeans are talking
about in terms of a "modern type man" on the planet Earth,
and their story about the appearance of the survivors of the destruction
of the planet Kantek - the so-called Aryan-Nordic types.
It is clear, from
what the Cassiopaeans have indicated, that the "out of Africa"
hypothesis is correct, as far as it goes. Earth may have been populated
from the South, but it was "enlightened" from the North -
at least in the most recent cycle, of which we are a part.
Everyone
agrees that we evolved from more primitive ancestors represented by
fossils and traditionally called Homo erectus. The disagreement erupts
over where, when, and how. From the critical time period, roughly 400,000
to 100,000 years ago, there is an ambiguous clutter of bones that people
have reluctantly agreed to group together and call "archaic Homo
Sapiens," because they don't know what else to call them. ...Some
scientists also keep a separate bin for the more us-like fossils in
the group, producing the exquisite oxymoron "archaic moderns."
Berkeley scientists
Allan Wilson and Vincent Sarich got it into their heads to look for
clues to the human past not out on the African savanna but among the
proteins of living people and primates. ...They claim that mutations
occur across the millennia at a steady rate, like the ticks of a molecular
clock. If this is true, the difference in a given protein in any two
species would indicate not only how related they were, but also how
much time had elapsed since they shared a common ancestor.
...The first efforts
to create such a genetic history of humanity focused on blood chemistry.
Every person alive bears a gene that determines whether his or her
blood will be type A, B, O, or AB. Human blood also contains an antigen
to destroy invading toxins, which comes in two forms, Rh-positive
and Rh-negative. ...American Indians are virtually all type O. Rh
negative blood is found almost exclusively among Europeans and is
most prevalent in the Basque people of the Western Pyrenees. Since
blood groups are determined by specific known genes and do not seem
to be related much to environmental pressures, they are far more useful
in judging the relationships of populations than superficial anatomical
characteristics like skin color. If you were to judge by skin color,
Africans and Australians would appear to be closely related. When
you look at their blood chemistry, however, they turn out to be about
as far apart as two human populations can be; their dark skins are
merely a shared adaptation to living under a tropical sun.
Caucasians and Negroids are more closely related to each other
than either is to the third major group: Mongoloids. The group "Mongoloid"
includes Australians and American Indians as well as Asians.
...Mitochondrial
genes ...are inherited only from your mother, who received them from
her mother, who got them from her mother, and so on back through a
chain of mothers. ...If you are male, your Mitochondrial lineage will
die out no matter how many children you have, unless you have a sister
who gives birth to a daughter and continues the line into the future.
Unperturbed by the genetic reshuffling going on inside the nucleus
with every generation, Mitochondrial DNA - lodged in the cellular
structures outside the nucleus - serves as a sort of genetic tracer
bullet, lighting up the route to the past. ...The only reason one
person's Mitochondrial DNA differs from another's is simply the passage
of time [since they had a common ancestor.]
...There is
very little difference between any two people's mtDNA, suggesting
that everyone's common ancestor had lived surprisingly recently.
...The pattern of variation in mtDNA among the five populations often
corresponded to geographic and ethnic origin. ...The Old World populations
sorted out into two distinct groups: African and non-African, with
the African mtDNA types showing much more variation than the non-African
ones.
Taken together,
[these] results suggested that there had been a recent, single point
of origin for the modern human race. There were two ways of determining
where that origin had been, and these came in conflict. If the mutations
in human mitochondria occur steadily through time, and if more mutations
have accumulated in Africa than anywhere else, then Africa should
be the homeland whence all populations have spring. [It was] found,
however, that the type of human mitochondria most closely related
to that of other primates popped up in Asians more frequently than
in other populations, suggesting instead that the point of origin
was somewhere in Asia.
...[More research
was done and it was shown that] a European woman's mtDNA might resemble
an African's more closely than that of another European. ...Humans
all over the world are amazingly similar, genetically more alike ...than
two subspecies of gorilla in Africa that are separated by only a few
hundred miles. ...The simplest explanation is that all human races
had originated in Africa. The ultimate point of convergence was the
same for everyone: a single African woman whose mitochondria gave
rise to all existing human types. ...It would have taken between
140,000 and 290,000 [estimated] years of steadily accumulating mutations
to account for the number of variations they found among living Mitochondrial
types.
When "Eve"
was supposed to have lived... the Homo erectus migration out of Africa
was already very ancient history ...The common ancestor of all non-African
people [i.e.white] would be younger still. [This genetically isolated
population] remained [in Africa] for thousands of years. Later, perhaps
as recently as 50,000 years ago, this one group must have left Africa,
pushing north and east.
...On this point
the latent conflict between the geneticists and the anthropologists
erupted into open war. Unlike the earlier erectus migrants, Eve's
descendants would not have arrived in a humanless landscape. By one
estimate, some 1.3 million members of our genus were living on earth
50,000 years ago, a good many of them spread throughout Eurasia. These
ancient Eurasians were not demi-apes living in trees; they were our
trusted European familiars, the Neandertals, along with other large-brained
folk in Asia. And, of course, these older Europeans and Asians were
passing Mitochondrial genes down through the generations, spinning
on through their daughters and their daughters' daughters. Then
suddenly, ALL of the lines stopped. ...There is no trace of them in
modern people. They have simply vanished from the genetic legacy of
the human species.
"If populations
representing the earlier inhabitants of Eurasia had contributed to
the living human gene pool, we'd expect to find Mitochondrial types
around today that are five times more variable... They just don't
seem to be there." [Stoneking, Berkeley, quoted by Shreeve]
"The best
explanation for why you don't see these ancient non-African mitochondria
is that they are not part of the modern human lineage in the first
place. ...In other words, the African people replaced the residents
without interbreeding with them. Some people don't like our conclusions."
[Allan Wilson, Berkeley, quoted by Shreeve] Some people including
the majority of anthropologists alive. [Shreeve, 1995]
At about the same
time that the above book was being written, the Cassiopaeans had this
to say about the subject:
A: Who, or what
made you?
Q: (RC) The Creator. (L) Prime Creator.
A: How? And who is Prime Creator?
Q: (L) Everything, I guess.
A: You are "Prime Creator." Prime Creator Manifests IN you. But...
who was secondary?
Q: (RC) The Sons of God? The Elohim?
A: Who is that? Remember, your various legends are "seen through a
veil."
Q: (L) ...Are the Orions these secondary creators?
A: Here comes a shocker for you... one day, in 4th density, it will
be your descendants mission to carry on the tradition and assignment
of seeding the 3rd density universe, once you have the adequate knowledge!!!
Q: (L) If the Orion STS brought the Celts here, were the Celts, while
they lived on Kantek, in the form they are in now?
A: They were lighter in appearance.
Q: (RC) Well, I read that it was the Pleiadians. And the Hebrews were
originally the Hoovids who came from Sirius... (L) You have told us
on other occasions that the Semitic peoples were remnants of the Atlanteans,
and yet they are quite unlike...
A: Whoa!! Wait a minute, let's not get ahead of ourselves. First things
first. What Roxanne said was not entirely factual. Remember, there
is much disinformation to weed through.
Q: (RC) What did I say that was not factual?
A: In this part of your 3rd and 4th density universe, specifically
your "galaxy" it is the region known as Orion that is the one and
only indigenous home of human type beings... reflect on this! Indigenous
home base, not sole locator. What you are most in need of review of
is the accurate profile of "alien" data.
Q: (RC) I thought that humans originated in Lyra and then a war broke
out there and they ended up in Orion.
A: Lyra is not inhabited. There have been homes in all places, but
some were/are transitory, and some are not. Pay attention to Orion!
This is your ancestral home, and your eventual destination. Here is
the absolutely accurately accurate profile of Orion to follow: This
is the most heavily populated region of your Milky Way galaxy! This
is a region that extends across 3rd and 4th density space for a distance
as vast as the distance between your locator and it. There are 3,444
inhabited "worlds" in this region. Some are planets as you know them.
Some are artificially constructed planetoids. Some are floating space
barges. And some are "satellites." There are primary homes, traveling
stations and incubator laboratories all in 2nd, 3rd and 4th densities.
There are overseer zones in 5th and 6th densities. Approximately
one half is STO and one half is STS. Together, along with many
other colonies, located elsewhere, this is called, in translation,
Orion Federation. Orions created grays in 5 varieties, as cybergenetic
beings, and installed them on Zeta Reticuli 1, 2, 3, and 4, as well
as on 2 planets orbiting Barnard's Star. The Reptilians also inhabit
6 planets in the Orion region in 4th density, and are owned by the
Orion STS as slaves, and, in some cases, pets!!! The name "Orion"
is the actual native name, and was brought to earth directly. Study
the legend of the "god" of Orion for parallels.
Q: (L) Are the Orion STS the infamous redheaded Nordic aliens?
A: Yes, and all other humanoid combinations.
Q: (L) Okay, if it started with the Nordic types, and that is where
the other humanoid combinations came from, what genetic combinations
were used for human beings? Black people, for instance, since they
are so unlike "Nordics?"
A: The Nordic genes were mixed with the gene pool already available
on Earth, known as Neanderthal.
Q: (L) What was the genetic combination used to obtain the Oriental
races?
A: Orientals come from a region known in your legends as "Lemuria,"
and are a previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures from
within Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and cosmic
ray environment then existent on earth.
Q: (L) Okay, what about the Semitic and Mediterranean peoples?
A: Each time a new flock was "planted," it was engineered to be best
suited to the environment where it was planted. Aryans are the only
exception, as they had to be moved to earth in an emergency.
Q: (L) If races are engineered on earth to be "best suited," what
factors are being drawn from or considered regarding the Semitic race?
A: They are not engineered on earth, but in Orion lab as all others.
They were "Planted" in the Middle East.
Now, notice this
last phrase: "human types are genetically engineered in Orion labs."
This means that they must use the same "mitochondria" as the
basis, changing and recombining only the nuclear DNA. If this is so,
then it would explain why ALL humans have the same "Mother."
It would also explain why this "mother" is so "recent."
But, of course, without admitting to the "interference" possibility
from a quasi-physical higher "density," these problems may
never be understood. The Cassiopaeans did have something to say about
the "Neandertal Enigma."
Q:
(L) What happened to Neanderthal man?
A: Removed by Lizzies to other planets.
Q: (L) Is that removed as in taken off the planet physically?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What planet were they taken to?
A: Others.
[...]
Q: You said that Neanderthal man had been taken by the Lizzies to another
planet, now, I don't want to know what other planet, but I would like
to know what state, evolutionary speaking, is Neanderthal man in at
present, as we measure time?
A: No progress, still the same.
[...]
Q: When did the Aryans invade India?
A: 8243 years ago.
Q: Who was there before that?
A: Asian tribes and number 3 prototype.
Q: What is a number 3 prototype?
A: Known as Neanderthal man.
Q: And what are we?
A: Number 4 types c and d. Translation into English comprehension.
[...]
Q: (L) Now, you said that the Nephilim were seeded on a planet called
D'Ankhiar as were human beings. When you said we were "seeded"
there, what did you mean.
A: Was proper environment for molecularization.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the physical bodies on planet earth, the
various types of mankind such as Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, Australopithicus
etc., were generated on that other planet and then brought here?
A: Yes.
[...]
Q: (L) Okay, I had a question I wanted to get in: you said that Neanderthal
man was taken off the earth, and Cro- Magnon man suddenly appeared.
Is this Cro-Magnon man really Kantekkian man?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Well, they supposedly existed side by side on the Earth for some
time. Did they intermix or intermarry?
A: Marriage?!
Q: (L) Well, you know what I mean! Genetic intermixing.
A: Can you picture a Neanderthal marriage?
Q: (L) Yeah! The old club 'em and drag 'em off by the hair ceremony!
(T) It was a ritual... handed down father to son along with the club...
And, of course,
the arrival of Cro-Magnon - and his "amazing cave art" and
the "sudden impetus" to "civilization" will never
be understood either without this perspective though obviously, from
the above remark, there is something even more strange about Cro-Magnon.
Clearly, the issue
of what kind of man was man before the Fall comes to mind. We already
have an idea that he was not precisely fully physical in 3rd density
terms, but was yet somewhat physical. Apparently, being a 3rd density
STO being in alignment with 4th density STO is an altogether different
experience than being a 3rd density STS being with the concomitant "compartmentalization"
and contraction of being that results in separation and conflict. But,
at one point, when discussing these matters with the Cassiopaeans, some
clues were given:
Q: Now, I have
this book entitled Arktos. [The Author] says something
here that echoes a remark you once made. He writes: "It is a very
remarkable thing that enlightenment seems to have come from the North
against the common prejudice that the Earth was enlightened as
it was populated from South to North. The Scythians are one of
the most ancient nations; the Chinese descend from them. The Atlanteans
themselves, more ancient than the Egyptians, descend from them." You
said that the civilizing influence came from the North to the South.
Of course, all the standard texts claim that civilization came from
South to North, starting in Mesopotamia. Now, getting...
A: Okay, just a minute here. Thinking Mesopotamia is the beginning
is like thinking that the beginning starts at the 12th chapter.
Q: I know that! The problem is: finding artifacts. I've been searching
and digging, and I find a little bit here and there, but my God! Either
nothing survived...
A: Artifacts have a limited shelf life!
This
remark could be taken a couple of ways, though I didn't notice it at the
time. On the one hand, it could refer to the fact that few organic artifacts
survive the ravages of time; on the other hand, it could refer to the
fact that, even if such artifacts are found, they "disappear"
rather quickly, as has been noted time and again, due to academic denial
that they CAN exist. And, in some cases, it seems that direct action has
been taken by the academic community to "remove from the shelf"
what does not fit their theories.
Q: Exactly! The
problem is that they've got specimens of humanoid types from 100 to
200 thousand years ago, and even further, but no specimens of modern
man that are that old. Why is this so? Are they just looking in the
wrong places?
A: Specimens survive by sheer luck.
Q: So, they are lucky that they have any specimens at all. Who knows,
when they find a very ancient specimen of a modern type human, they
won't believe it - it will be called an "anomaly!" There ARE artifacts
that are EXTREMELY ancient, which give evidence of the presence of
modern type man, and they just simply argue themselves to death over
them.
A: Yes.
Q: But, during the time Neanderthal man was on the Earth, did he live
alongside Modern man? A: Yes. Except modern type man was different
then.
Q: In what ways?
A: DNA and psycho/electrical frequencies.
Q: Does this mean that their physical appearance was different from
what we consider to be modern man?
A: Radiance.
Q: What do you mean "radiance?"
A: You find out!
Q: Oh, that's interesting. Well, there are legends that the Northern
people had "light" in their veins. Very ancient belief. Is this what
you are referring to?
A: Maybe.
Q: Was this light related to the hemoglobin level, the iron level
in the blood?
A: Maybe.
Q: Did they have a much higher iron level in their blood?
A: Possibly....
Q: Okay, part of the ancient legend of Arktos was that, in very ancient
times the Earth was different because it had a vertical axial orientation.
This contributed to the golden age or the Edenic condition. Is this,
in fact, one of the conditions that existed in the Golden Age?
A; Well, yes, but still some puzzle pieces needed.
Q: I noticed also that there are several ballpark type figures given
for the precessional cycles. Apparently there is not a whole lot of
agreement as to how long this cycle is, exactly. I notice that, if
you divide 309,882 years by 12, you come out right in the ball park
of 12 precessional cycles. Is this the reason that the zodiac was
set up with twelve signs or houses?
A: Related, yes.
Q: Now, since all the recent conjecture about the precessional cycle
has really gone all over the place, it is my thought that the real
reason for the ancient clues about this cycle are to inform us that
the length of 12 of these cycles is a GRAND Cycle, and that THIS is
the big clue.
A: Needs some study by you.
Q: One of the interesting things about this Northern civilizational
factor is that one of the hallmarks of the Aryan attitude is the Male
dominated religion. When did the masculine religion "take over?" Was
this always the tendency or leaning of the Aryan group?
A: Involves more than religion. Religion is the facilitator.
Q: Facilitator of what?
A: Customary psycho/social habitué.
Q: Customary to whom? A: Those whom you refer to as Aryans. Q: Where
did they acquire the "habit" of a masculine oriented religion? Everybody
else was worshipping the goddess in one form or another. But this
male dominated theology was the distinguishing characteristic of the
Northern peoples. Where did they come up with this.
A: Originated on home planet.
Q: Kantek?
A: For all intents and purposes.
Q: Okay, when they were on their home planet, why did they develop
a masculine religion as opposed to a feminine one, considering the
fact that women are the source of life, in certain terms?
A: In your density, masculinism/feminism is essentially a roll of
"the dice." Remember, at higher levels gender is nonexistent.
Q: Well, the problem I am having here is this: the masculine religion
is monotheistic, essentially.
A: In your references.
Q: The Aryans always thought they were better than everybody else...
A: They were more advanced than the company they found themselves
amongst.
Q: But then, as far as I can tell, the Hebrew monotheism is also derived
from the Aryan, monotheistic, male dominated religion. It then "fathered"
Christianity, and that has been the whole patriarchal, kill-em-all
and let God sort-em-out war mongering thing under which we have lived
for over 2000 years. This is the Western, European mind... it came
from the Aryans, from the North; it was the so-called "civilizing"
influence in nearly every respect that you can track. The cohesiveness
and dominance of this type of thinking was able to civilize, but then
civilization involves dominance, killing, war, territory, the Hitler
scene, the whole nine yards. All of this is antithetical to all that
you promote as far as being desirable. Yet, you have said that you
were in contact with the Northern Peoples for millennia. Yes, Cassiopeia
is a Northern Constellation, and probably figured in the early myths
of these peoples in ways we cannot know, but the whole thing is that
they represent all that is STS.
A: But so do you, so then why did we contact you?
Q: Well. I don't buy into that whole monotheistic, dominator, warmongering,
make everybody conform to one way of thinking head trip!
A: So, you think all individuals conformed then, or is it the soul
that counts in the final analysis?
Q: Okay, obviously all individuals are different, and some did not
conform then, either.
A: And neither do you.
Q: Point taken. I am just having a hard time with this. I wish you
would just tell me! Who interacted with these Aryans to give them
this male-dominated, monotheistic idea that they then sought to impose
on every other human being on the planet - and are STILL trying!
A: Interactions were transdensity.
So, having gone
through this "brief history of mankind," and why we are here
in the first place, we come back again to that most interesting remark:
Desire based imbalance led to material existence. It seems that it was
an "okay" desire, because it was based on wanting to accelerate
the process of reunion with the One. But we see that this "wanting
to grow up" so fast was like the Prodigal Son who wanted to take
his inheritance and "travel to a far country."
Things in the "far
country" were not quite what the Son thought they were. Everything
had a "price," and he soon spent all his inheritance - lost
his original status - and found himself enslaved to live with and care
for the pigs.
This reference to
living and eating with pigs has a deep esoteric significance. The pig
is the animal of Set. It is said to represent the darker side of mankind
that does not strive toward the light. These are those "soul units"
that choose to remain as matter and never seek to wake up. More than
this, the pig represents what was desired in a very deep way, as we
will soon discover. You see, the pig is one of the few animals that
sweats. This characteristic of the pig - that it exudes water through
its skin as humans do - represents an esoteric symbol that is an amazing
"disjecta membra" of vanished scientific knowledge. And this
knowledge relates to the very thing we are going to be discussing: FEELINGS.
Remember, it was
the desire to FEEL, in a very specific sense, that led to the Fall.
And it is this that we are going to examine in a very careful way to
determine if this idea can possibly be true.
The following bears
repeating:
Q: (L) Did, at
any time, the human race live for a long time in an Edenic state,
where they were able to use bodies and still have a spiritual connection?
A: Yes. But not long. No addiction takes long to close the circle.
Q: (L) So, mankind was addicted to pleasuring the self?
A: Became quickly.
In
the previous section I made the remark that we are "made addicts
inside our own skins." This may have seemed to be hyperbole to
some readers or a mere analogy to others. I would like to make it
clear here that it is neither. It is a cold, hard fact. We are addicts
to the molecules of our emotions and, by extension, to those things
and people who provide our "fix" by stimulating the chemicals
to be released.
Terry
Burnham and Jay Phelan write in Mean Genes:
Most of us would
feel cheated if we bought a car or a microwave and it came without
instructions. But our most important possessions - body and mind -
come with no such guide, leaving us searching haphazardly for satisfaction:
a dollop of exercise, thirteen minutes of sex, a "happy Meal,"
a cocktail, and a sport-utility vehicle. ...When we drive a car or
operate a microwave, our orders are carried out exactly as we command.
The machine doesn't talk back or have an agenda of its own - at least
not yet. On the other hand, if we tell our brain, as part of a New
Year's resolution, to cut down on fatty foods, it most likely will
let out a hearty laugh and continue to set off bells and whistles
of approval when the dessert cart rolls around. Our brain, for better
or worse, is not an obedient servant. It has a mind of its own. Imagine
that you are two things: a personality who has likes, dislikes, desires,
and dreams. But inside your body there is also a "machine,"
your brain, that processes commands and acts on those likes, dislikes,
desires, and dreams. It fights you all the time. And it usually wins.
...Why do we have battles over controlling our own behavior? And why
are these battles so hard to win? Are cats and dogs obsessed with
fighting addictions, controlling their weight, and remaining faithful
to their mates? Do chimpanzees regularly resolve to be less selfish?
In a creepy campfire legend, a baby-sitter alone in a house receives
increasingly menacing phone calls. Terrified, she contacts the police,
who put a tap on her phone. After the boogieman calls again, the cops
frantically phone her, screaming, "We've traced the call. It's
coming from inside the house! Get out!" Similarly, the source
of our self-control problems lies within us... But we can't get out
or leave them behind. Manipulative media, greedy businesses, and even
our friends and family play roles in nurturing our demons. Still,
most of our self-control problems stem from our impulses to do things
that are bad for us or for those whom we love. A visit to any bookstore
reveals the nature of our struggles. Glancing at the bestsellers,
we can see what's on people's minds. There are dozens of books on
finding love, losing weight, and creating wealth. Conspicuously absent
are a host of other topics. Where are the books entitled How to Build
a Bigger Beer Gut, Ten Steps to Frivolous Spending, or Nurturing the
Infidel Within? [Burnham & Phelan, 2000]
Even though they
are writing in a lighthearted way, these guys aren't kidding. And it's
even worse than they let on.
If the reader will
recall the movie The Matrix, they will surely remember
the scene of the vast warehouse of human beings suspended in pods filled
with gelatinous fluid, connected to a vast energy storage system by
many "feeder lines" embedded deeply in their flesh. These
were the humans "in the Matrix." There reality was totally
illusory, created and maintained by a giant computer that coordinated
all the various individual realities so that their "dreams"
were, in a sense, as One. And through the experiences that were being
"fed" to them, they generated in their bodies various amounts
of "power" that "fed the system" itself.
Though this was
an allegory - and where the writers came up with the inspiration we
don't know - it is very close to the truth based on what the Cassiopaeans
have told us, and supported by corroboration from many sources.
Can we PROVE it?
Nope. But the fact is, no other "view" of the reality of Cosmic
connections can be proven either. And this one has one thing that the
subjective views do not have: empirical evidence.
If the reader will
take the time to study the matter deeply, to not be afraid to look at
the patterns of Rubik's Cube and see how chaotic they are, and to work
with trying to align the colors into coherent patterns, the evidence
will gradually lead to a perspective that is objective and not based
on "faith" and "feeling."
We learn from Michael
Topper some of the more terrible things that the Cassiopaeans have told
us, and which we have read about in various reports and exposes of underground
bases and truly revolting "mind control" experiments:
In the Conscious
domain of the higher densities, Light indeed becomes the overt mediating
term, the common coinage and efficient aim - and that both for positive
and negative realms. Yet whereas in the positive realms the the [mode]
is to draw the developing soul toward deep degrees of expansion INTO
light, in the corresponding negative realms the object is, rather,
a ...development of appropriate mind/body mechanical means of devouring
more light, stuffing the light-energy into the voracious hole or constitutional
void of emotional lack comprising the negative state of the ego-soul
altogether.
The work of the
negative being is to determine the formulae, extort and coax the technical
keys of force-opening the internal mind/body centers and corresponding
energy fields. The negative's business is to plunder the rich beds
of energy-nutriment - the various treasure-troves of the vast creative
domains where 'loosh' or psychic energy-food is manufactured in abundance.
...Light
isn't inimical to the negative orientation, as is portrayed in our superstitions
and folklore; like its positive counterpart, the negative recognizes
and overtly values light as sustenance; food for producing integral
reactions toward progressively higher alignments. Just as all matter
- the food of this dimension - is intellectually understandable as a
kind of packaged 'light-value' woven in phosphates of the ATP molecule,
so light is overtly valued as the energy-essence/lunchbox of the higher
densities.
So, whereas higher-density
positive entities might be considered Light Beings, higher density
negatives are more like ... light eaters.
They are the light-eaters,
the devourers of light. That's why they're associated with 'darkness,'
because the light is lapped up into the cavernous black hole of their
congenital emptiness, their persistent lack. Light is sucked into
the abyss where their heart should be, in order to try to compensate
or fill-in for the Love that isn't there.
All the massive
operations they undertake [throughout the universe] are just a means
of 'cornering the market' on energy, monopolizing all the known fields
of light or light potential. The expanding order they attempt to impose,
the totalitarian control over increasingly large numbers of people,
is the fantastical and internally self-contradictory project of coercing
everything in creation to work for them, to cultivate and keep the
fields of their energy-reserves and to furnish self-replenishing 'herds'
of emotional source-nutriment which can be converted into useful
energy or light-capital. Since the negative beings can't generate
an important light-energy source themselves, i.e. the emotional range
of energy-values belonging to the 'heart,' they steal the manipulated
and artificially regulated emotional reserves of the beings harnessed
in thrall to them...
This [relates
to] the rumors circulating around about the underground Dulce facilities
where aliens have been reported to take infernal 'baths' in vats of
liquid stewed with human and animal parts, a kind of diabolic broth
of enzymes and hormones they're supposed to absorb for nutriment through
their skin.
...Hormones of
the human ductless systems and various kinds of human and animal enzymes,
neurotransmitters, lymphocytes and extract of digestive chyle furnishes
variable measures of a radiant energy-value; especially the human
reproductive system - the specific cells of reproduction are just
saturated with subtle energy-charge...
There are in fact
multiple uses to which these 'natural resources' of the human system
may be put. As grim as it might seem, the 'aliens' perceived to indulge
that hormonal baptism are generally biobot replicants, hybrid forms
created from genetic tissue of humans, animals and even plants; They
have vestigial digestive systems, virtually inoperative because these
types of biobot-form follow the general template of the higher dimensional
negative beings only in more grounded and stabilized, physical terms.
The higher-dimensional
beings in their own context have subtle, vertical filamental axes
attached to the subtle nerve-networks of [both the biobots and human
beings]. [In humans], these filamental, ethereal "straws"
are drawn into the body through the etheric chakras that connect the
body to the higher-density systems. These chakra systems correspond
to the clusters of neuropeptide receptors, and it is the objective
of the STS forces to stimulate the production of vast amounts of high
light energy values contained in these peptides so that they can feed
on the energy rich extracts of the human reproductive and glandular
structures...
Tremendous concentrations
of desirable energy-values, laced with the emotional juices that generate
them, are involved in neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine,
and in epinephrine/ norepinephrine, and other hormones of the sympathetic
systems. Chemicals of psychic stress are very charged [whether they
are of a "blissful" nature, or pure unmitigated terror.]
The 4th density
consciousness, connected to [the physiology of numerous human beings]
by these astro-etheric threads and plexiform webs of control, can
send signals to its 3rd density "marionettes" generating
emotions that force choices that result in any number of activities
resulting in enriched feeding. [Extracted from: Précis
on the Good, The Bad, and What Curls Up Under a Rock]
Now, this idea is
most definitely "out there." Certainly none of us wishes to
contemplate such a control system as is allegorized in The Matrix. It's
goo Hollywood, but we can leave the theater and go home and be secure
in the belief that it is ONLY movie magic. Or can we?
Well, it seems that
this is not even a new idea. There are numerous sculptures in mediaeval
churches that are said to represent sinners being punished in Hell or
Purgatory. It is thought that they are "visual exhortations to
renounce sin." However, we find that there is another explanation
for these images, given by the teacher of Mark Hedsel in Zelator, which
I shall include here with some following remarks.
 |
|
From the
West front of Saint-Pierre, Moissac. 14th century, after Witkowski
.Left: Wood engraving of demon grasping a woman.
Right: Wood engraving of demons riding on the back of a beggar
and a miser.
|
The first thing
we must realize is that the sculptors were not, as we might imagine,
portraying a future state in Hell or Purgatory. The images are portrayals
of ordinary human beings - of ordinary sinners in life. The woman
attacked by reptiles, is a libertine. This is why her private parts
and breasts are receiving such attention from the monster-toads, and
why the demon who grasps her is being so sexually explicit with the
snake.
The pair carrying
demons piggyback are intended to reveal the sin of Avarice: the seated
figure, clutching his moneybags, is a miser, refusing to give alms
to the beggar.
However,
these people are not in Hell: they are portrayals of Etheric and Astral
forms. They reveal people as they would be seen by someone with developed
clairvoyant vision, able to perceive on the Spiritual planes. They are
symbolic forms of the Etheric and Astral bodies. A true clairvoyant
would be able to see those hideous reptiles, and those possessing demons.
The naked woman
is not in Hell. She is depicted as a living being - but it is not
her physical body which is being portrayed. It is her Etheric body.
The truth is that, as a consequence of her predisposition to sin in
a particular way, the soul of the libertine woman is constantly being
devoured by monstrous forms. No matter how beautiful or alluring her
physical body may be, her Etheric body is - as an immediate consequence
of sin - darkened by demonic forms which devour her. I repeat - this
is not a picture of punishment in Hell, but of an unhealthy Etheric
body, in life.
...The nakedness
of her body is intended as in indication that it is her Etheric body
only - what the Moissac artists would have described as the ens
venenei, or the vegetabilis. This explains why she is lifting
her arms, grasping at her hair. This is the gesture of the Etheric
soul. The same gesture is found in the Christian images painted and
scratched on the walls of the catacombs in Rome, and has been called
the "orans," or praying gesture. In fact, such images
are derived from the Egyptian hieroglyphic for the ka.
These
hints leave us in no doubt that the woman is alive, and that we are
being privileged to look into the state of her Etheric body. ...This
is an example of the use of an occult blind.
Now, turn your
attention to the second engraving... The person gifted with clairvoyant
vision will see the beggar approaching the miser on the Astral plane.
He will see the demons directing this transaction: the demons are,
so to speak, bypassing the Ego of the men. This is no human transaction,
but a demonic one. The demons sit above the heads of the men to show
that they are gripping on to their Egos. Do not forget that our word
possession is derived from a Latin word meaning literally "sitting
on."
...Now, in contrast
to the nakedness of the woman, the miser and the beggar are clothed.
This may be explained in terms of the need to indicate their ranks
- the beggar is in torn clothing with only one trouser leg. We may
judge from the clothing of the seated man that he is a person of some
substance. However, there is another reason why the pair are clothed:
this covering indicates that they are being depicted on the next level
up from the Etheric - that is, on the Astral plane - on what in the
days when this sculpture was made would have been called the animalis,
or the ens astrale.
We may have little
doubt that the clothing is meant as a kind of Astral mask, for neither
man wears shoes. This is an arcane technique for showing that neither
is standing on the physical Earth. The most Earthy element in this
portrayal is the heavy moneybag: this appears to be tied around his
neck, as a punishment, weighing down his soul.
...The demons
who possess the couple are Astral beings: the wings of the one on
the left indicate that it can "fly" on the Astral planes.
The horns of the other, crescent in form, remind us that the demons
are linked with the Moon. However, just as the woman does not know
that her Etheric body is being devoured by monstrous forms, so the
miser does not know that his Astral body is being weighed down by
his riches, and by the demon which grips its legs around his neck
This is not so much symbolism as a direct portrayal of what can be
perceived on the Spiritual plane, by those with eyes to see. [Hedsel,
Zelator, pp 62,63]
We note right away
that there is a sort of "righteous" flavor to this interpretation.
It is given in archaic terms of Sin and demons and possession. We already
have the idea that the ancient stories of demons and lesser gods were
actual descriptions of encounters with 4th density denizens; beings
we now refer to in the modern day as "aliens." Descriptions
of these things were given in languages that are not "technical,"
as is modern English which "reinvents" itself constantly -
creating and adding new terms as science progresses in its understanding.
Later, occultists,
or those seeking for answers in these representations created by those
who had received this information, passed down orally, for the most
part, who were not privy to the "inside" information, did
not understand the literal nature of these images, nor the true reality
they portrayed. They began to interpret them in terms of "astral"
and "etheric" entities, rather than what they really were:
energy symbols of the interaction with 4th density STS beings.
Having the understanding
of 4th density reality, we can see that the woman described as a "sinner"
and a "libertine," may not be either of those at all - merely
an ordinary human being who is asleep in the Matrix and whose sexual
energies are providing nutriment to those levels. That the creatures
are "attached" to her indicates the fibrous network of the
energy conduits, and it is clear that the monster- man holding the snake
as though it were a phallus, while at the same time gripping the arm
of the woman is meant to show us that there is a being at another level
who is behind this activity. And, in addition to the upraised arms being
a symbol of the Ka, the hair is also a symbol of "virility"
or "virtue" and the woman is hanging onto it for dear life,
battling the loss of her life force.
In the second image,
I don't think that we are being shown a beggar approaching a miser.
I have a slightly different basic "take" on this for a couple
of reasons. The rolled up pants leg is one of the "accoutrements"
of the Masonic initiation, and other than that, I do not perceive that
the man is dressed in "rags." The seated figure has crossed
legs - a Rosicrucian symbol - and the bag of whatever it is is suspended
around his neck by a cord, is still another occult symbol. The position
of his hands as well as the hands of the demon on the left figure are
also symbols.
My immediate reaction
to these figures is that they represent a body of occultists in high
positions. The man on the left may represent the social and educational
aspects of control, as he is a "traveler" "seeking wisdom",
hampered or directed by the being on his shoulder. The man on the right
seems to be a "kingly" or ruling figure, representing governments
controlled by the creature on his shoulders. That these two "creatures"
are in cahoots is clear by their communication with each other, but
it is also clear that they are of two different types, and that the
men are not having any interaction between them of a human nature.
That they are barefoot
has an even deeper significance: they have given away the Ruby Slippers.
They are sold out; co-opted; part of the STS hierarchy.
So, in effect, we
are seeing a graphic portrayal of ancient knowledge, clinched by the
reference to the Moon - a base of 4th density activities.
And, in the present
time, there are many individuals who are "seeing" the "shape-shifting"
or "overshadowing" of humans by Reptoid creatures. The mind
produces "symbols" for what the eyes, and even the clairvoyant
eyes, see. These events of shape-shifting or overshadowing that many
are taking to be an "astral demonic possession" in archaic
terms, are more likely a development of trans-density awareness that
is still being interpreted in the mind in a symbolic way. It is very
likely not a "spirit" possession, but is a clairvoyant seeing
of the Control System, imaged in ways the mind is set up to operate.
But, more on that in the next section.
Returning now to
Topper's suggestion that there is a substance produced by the human
sensorium, that is an "addictive drug" for 4th density STS,
this was a subject mentioned by the Cassiopaeans at one of the very
earliest contacts. According to Topper, this substance can only be generated
through the psychic pattern of terror, and can only be catalytically
effective when obtained from a still-living though on-the-verge-of-death-from-terror
subject. I will admit that I was so horrified by this information that
the project very nearly ended right there and then.
Like everyone else,
I had the idea that only the "good" things, (by human - or
MY - definition, of course), could exist at higher levels. It was only
later when I read the comment of Ra: "The All blinks neither
at the darkness nor at the light," that I realized that there
was a very DEEP truth being presented in such a comment. And to truly
understand this remark in the most important way, is to understand that
this "not blinking" at ANYTHING, is the true measure of the
level of contact. Truth is the only value at the highest levels,
and human judgments of what is "nice" or "not nice"
don't even figure in to the equations. So, a communicating entity that
makes a judgment as to whether this information or that information
is "useful" or not, is "blinking" and gives away
his level in that act. And, I suppose it could also be inferred from
this that the individual who filters is also "blinking," and
thereby judging.
But, getting to
what the Cassiopaeans had to say:
Q:
(L) Bob Lazar referred to the fact that aliens supposedly refer to humans
as containers. What does this mean?
A: Storage for later use.
Q: (L) Used for what?
A: 94 per cent Of all population. All are containers; 94 per cent will
be used.
Q: (L) Used for what?
A: Consumption.
Q: (L) You mean eaten?
A: Total consumption.
Q: (L) What do you mean by consumption? Ingested?
A: Consumed for ingredients.
Q: (L) Ingredients for what?
A: New race. Important. 13 years approximately when project will be
finished.
Q: (L) Why are humans consumed?
A: They are used for parts.
Q: (L) We don't understand. How can humans be used for parts?
A: Reprototype. The Vats exist. Missing persons often go there and especially
missing children.
Q: (L) Do we have any protection?
A: Some.
Q: (L) How can we protect ourselves and our children?
A: Inform them. Don't hide the truth from children.
Q: (L) How does truth protect us?
A: Awareness protects. Ignorance endangers.
Q: (L) Why tell children such horrible things?
A: They need to know.
Q: (L) What is the purpose of this project?
A: New life here.
Q: (L) Are the aliens using our emotions and energies?
A: Correct; and bodies too. Each earth year 10 percent more children
are taken.
Q: (L) Do they suffer?
A: Some. Bits of children's organs removed while they are wide awake.
Kidneys first; then next feet; next jaw examined on table; tongues cut
off; bones stress tested; pressure placed on heart muscle until it bursts.
Q: (L) Why are you telling us this awful stuff?
A: You must know what the consortium is doing. This is done mostly to
Indian children.
Q: (L) Why are things like this being done?
A: There is a big effort on behalf of Orions and their human brethren
to create a new race and control it as well as the rest of humanity.
Q: (L) What happens to the souls? Is this project physical only?
A: Physical; and souls recycled.
Q: (L) Where do the souls go?
A: Back here for the most part.
Q: (L) Do some go elsewhere?
A: Some go to other planets.
Q: (L) Who is responsible for this project?
A: Consortium.
Q: (L) This is sick!
A: Sick is subjective.
Q: (L) But this whole thing is so awful.
A: We understand your feelings, but all does not conform to your perspective.
Q: (L) Why is this happening to earth?
A: Karma.
Q: (L) What kind of Karma could bring this?
A: Atlantis.
Q: (L) What can protect us?
A: Knowledge.
Q: (L) How do we get this knowledge?
A: You are being given it through this source now.
Q: (L) How does the knowledge of what you have told us help us?
A: Gives great defense. ... Just knowing about it gives psychic defense.
[...]
Q: (L) Is there any way we can prevent Orion abductions?
A: No.
Q: (L) Why?
A: It would interfere with universal law of free will and service to
self.
Q: (L) But we don't want to be abducted. Can't we stop it?
A: Not likely. They have more power than you.
Q: (L) Well then, why can't you help us?
A: Would interfere in natural progression of your race and theirs. The
Jews called upon us to save them and we could not. And, natives of your
land called upon us and we could not save them from your race; we could
not stop that either. It is natural progression, see?
Q: (L) Are we going to be wiped out by aliens as part of this natural
progression?
A: Maybe. What makes you think you are special?
Q: (L) Jesus told us God loves us. Is this true?
A: Yes. But it is the soul that matters, not the body. The body dies
not the soul.
Q: (L) Well, this whole thing just gives us the creeps.
A: You are energy. There is an energy that comes from the soul and body
connection; later the body is used for parts.
Q: (L) What are they using our energy and bodies for?
A: To create a new race. Theirs is fading out.
Q: (L) Well, do they just take people and kill them and do what with
them?
A: They slice them up.
Q: (L) Do they die?
A: Maximum matter and energy transfer occurs during this type of transition.
Q: (L) In other words, you are saying that a slow painful death gives
them the most of what they want? This is totally sick.
A: You asked for truth. You say it is sick but it is merely the ultimate
form of service to self. (At this point A___ described reading a passage
in a book which stated that Native Americans believed a slow torturous
death of an enemy gave them more power.)
A: What about your lab animals? Is that not service to self as well?
What about unwanted insects et cetera?
Q: (L) We were here first!
A: So were the insects. Grays now want your planet.
Q: (L) That is sick.
A: Is natural progression sick?
Q: (L) Is what is happening something like what Jesus described in the
parable of the wheat where the workers come in to take out the weeds
first?
A: Close.
Q: (L) What kind of people is this being done to?
A: Low level humans.
Q: (L) What happens to the high level humans?
A: Some will survive.
And, as Topper so
delicately puts it: "I leave the rest to your imagination."
It also seems to
be very probable that much of the more horrific stuff that is being
reported by various "escapees" from various mind-control programs,
or from "underground bases" where they have witnessed unparalleled
scenes of horror, may have been deliberately exposed to projected
and controlled thought-forms. These individuals have been 'selected'
to escape from their captors or programmers, to be returned to the regular
world so as to begin circulating their fearful and depressing stories.
This is calculated to induce an atmosphere of terror, the cumulative
energies of which will, of course, serve admirably as "food"
for the 4th density STS. Another aim, suggests Topper, is to instill
an overall atmosphere of depression, despair and ultimate defeatism
before 'they" even surface on any large scale to the daylight of
general mass perception. In this way, they can devitalize any potential
resistance or aggressive anger before the fact.
There is an observable
tendency of the 4th density STS beings to continuously move in relentless
stages of materialization that begin with the playful nightmare of the
dream state, into waking reality.
And this brings
us back again to the idea that Knowledge Protects.
We can pretty well
surmise that there are "experiments" taking place with human
beings similar to those that will be described in the next section.
And every other range of experimentation that humans undertake in the
various compartments of our world likely have a counterpart in 4th density
reality. It's not much different from the image of the newborn baby
being plugged into the Matrix in the movie to become a source of energy
for the system.
It seems to be that
the nature of the "far country" of the Prodigal Son, the reality
on which we have "spent our inheritance," or energy, IS the
Matrix.
The session quoted
above was a watershed experience for me. I had the option of jumping
back into safe and cozy denial, or I could look at the information that
was being given and evaluate it based on whether or not there was any
corroboration, i.e. was it TRUE?
And then, of course,
even if it WAS true, what could be the possible motivation behind the
Cassiopaeans even telling me this? I can guarantee you that if you had
been present, you would have realized that every question I asked was
framed from a state of near hysteria.
But, what has been
the result of knowing these things? What is the fruit of "facing
the truth?" For me, the result has been to ignite a drive for information
in order to discover first of all, whether such things could be true;
and second of all, to acquire the knowledge and awareness that CAN protect.
And, what is more, being exposed to what IS has a tendency to condition
the mind to NOT BLINK at anything.
Am I telling you
this to scare you? Are the Cassiopaeans pulling back the curtain to
reveal the machinations behind the curtain doing so to terrify you into
a state of paralysis?
Well, that's up
to you.
If you are paralyzed
by it, you are welcome to go back to the center of your Rubik's Cube
and believe with all your heart and soul that the chaotic colors are
arranged as you would like them to be. You are welcome to open your
heart to any being that will come along and support you in your delusion,
soothing your terror with honeyed words that "it'll be all right!
Just have faith and that nasty real world out there will fade away..."
which you can cling to, thereby attaching you to such a consciousness
for its own feeding purposes.
If, on the other
hand, you begin to understand that Knowledge, when applied, can be applied
to moving the colors on the cube into REAL alignment, so that your polarization
toward FREEDOM and TRUTH is amplified, thus leveling the playing field;
then let us proceed.
Knowledge Protects.
You are visitor number .
|
